> On Sunday, 30 of March 2008, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > On Saturday, 29 of March 2008, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@xxxxxxx> > > > > > > Introduce 'struct pm_ops' and 'struct pm_ext_ops' representing > > > suspend and hibernation operations for bus types, device classes and > > > device types. > > > > > > Modify the PM core to use 'struct pm_ops' and 'struct pm_ext_ops' > > > objects, if defined, instead of the ->suspend() and ->resume() or, > > > respectively, ->suspend_late() and ->resume_early() callbacks that > > > will be considered as legacy and gradually phased out. > > > > Unfortunately I forgot to set dev->power.status to DPM_PREPARING before > > calling ->prepare(), as documented. Also, dpm_prepare() could cleaned up > > a bit. > > > > Fixed patch follows. > > My testing shows that some drivers tend to return error codes from their > ->resume() callbacks, even though the devices in question appear to work > correctly after the seemingly failing suspend. The drivers should be fixed not to do that, no? -- (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html _______________________________________________ linux-pm mailing list linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
