On Thu 2008-03-20 14:10:57, David Brownell wrote: > Get rid of a superfluous acpi_pm_device_sleep_state() parameter. The > only legitimate value of that parameter must be derived from the first > parameter, which is what all the callers already do. (However, this > does not address the fact that ACPI still doesn't set up those flags.) > > Signed-off-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> ACK, FWIW. -- (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html _______________________________________________ linux-pm mailing list linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
