Re: [RFC][PATCH] PM: Introduce new top level suspend and hibernation callbacks (rev. 2)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tuesday, 25 of March 2008, Oliver Neukum wrote:> Am Freitag, 21. März 2008 01:21:03 schrieb Johannes Berg:> > > + * All of the above callbacks, except for @complete(), return error codes.> > > + * However, the error codes returned by the resume operations, @resume(),> > > + * @thaw(), and @restore(), are only printed in the system logs, since the PM> > > + * core cannot do anything else about them.> > > > Why bother and not just make them return void, the error printing can> > most likely be done much much better in the callback since that possibly> > has information on why it failed.> > A device that cannot wake up is unusable. Shouldn't the pm core disconnect()> such a device?
Well, if ->resume() returns an error, the driver already knows there's aproblem and it can act upon that, at least in principle.
However, the PM core probably shouldn't try to resume the children of a failingdevice.  Also, if ->resume_noirq() fails, it probably is not a good idea tocall ->resume() and ->complete() for the same device and for it's children.
Thanks,Rafael_______________________________________________linux-pm mailing listlinux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm


[Index of Archives]     [Linux ACPI]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [CPU Freq]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux