On Wednesday, 19 of March 2008, Alan Stern wrote: > On Wed, 19 Mar 2008, Greg KH wrote: > > > On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 11:48:29AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > > > I'll drop everything, let's start again. > > > > > > Only how? umm, please review Greg's driver tree, let us know which patches > > > shoudl be dropped from that then send new ones, I guess. > > > > Yes, please do, I'm confused as well :) > > Okay. No doubt Rafael will correct me if I get something wrong. > > Greg's tree still contains the original, wrong version of > pm-make-wakeup-flags-available-whenever-config_pm-is-set.patch. It > should be reverted. In its place should be substituted this series of > patches (URLs for 0/3 ... 3/3): > > http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=120561808422302&w=2 > http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=120561808522316&w=2 > http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=120561808522322&w=2 > http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=120561808622328&w=2 > > There is likely to be a conflict in applying the 2/3 patch, because its > first hunk touches a region of code also affected by work Rafael has > been doing. The important aspect of that hunk is that it moves the > should_wakeup flag definition outside the region protected by "#ifdef > CONFIG_PM_SLEEP". I've just resent the three patches, rebased on top of the current tree. Please double check if everytning is right. Thanks, Rafael _______________________________________________ linux-pm mailing list linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
