On Monday 10 March 2008, Alan Stern wrote: > Currently include/linux/pm.h doesn't define the should_wakeup field in > dev_pm_info, or the related accessor macros, unless CONFIG_PM_SLEEP is > set. Right, and I certainly recall pointing that out sometime last year... so it's not exactly a new discovery. > This is wrong. Even though the system can't go to sleep, individual > devices may be placed in low-power states (runtime PM). Thus the > various wakeup settings should be available whenever CONFIG_PM is on. > > I don't want to submit a patch to fix the problem right now, because it > would clash with ongoing changes that Rafael is making. But the bug > needs to be fixed in time for 2.6.26. > > Alan Stern > _______________________________________________ linux-pm mailing list linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
