On Monday, 10 of March 2008, Alan Stern wrote: > Currently include/linux/pm.h doesn't define the should_wakeup field in > dev_pm_info, or the related accessor macros, unless CONFIG_PM_SLEEP is > set. > > This is wrong. Even though the system can't go to sleep, individual > devices may be placed in low-power states (runtime PM). Thus the > various wakeup settings should be available whenever CONFIG_PM is on. > > I don't want to submit a patch to fix the problem right now, because it > would clash with ongoing changes that Rafael is making. But the bug > needs to be fixed in time for 2.6.26. Well, I'm going to prepare a "for 2.6.26" series of patches to send to Greg (that won't include the "separate suspend and hibernation callbacks" patch yet). If you post a patch for this (with a changelog and s-o-b), I'll rebase it (if necessary) add it to the series. Thanks, Rafael _______________________________________________ linux-pm mailing list linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
