On Wed, 5 Mar 2008 11:03:52 -0500 (EST), Alan Stern <stern@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > There might still be logical problems, of course... We need to add a > mechanism for reordering the dpm_active list when device_move() is > called. But first we need to get in touch with the people using > device_move() -- basically just Marcel and Cornelia -- and see what > sort of mechanism they will need. On s390 we currently don't do anything suspend related at all - I'd need to think about that. (I use device_move() to reflect topology changes on the (virtual) hardware, so I'd guess the "don't suspend parent before child rule" should still apply afterwards. But of course, that also depends on what we actually need to do on the parent's bus and what on the child's bus.) _______________________________________________ linux-pm mailing list linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
