On Monday 03 March 2008, Pierre Ossman wrote: > On Mon, 3 Mar 2008 13:59:37 -0800 > David Brownell <david-b@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > Card insert/remove events can be system wake events though. Which > > makes that restriction impractical. This part seems to be ignored by your comment ... wake events. > > I think hosts need to be able to call mmc_detect_change() as soon as > > they see a stable signal. The MMC core can hold off handling that > > for a while, if it needs to wait until the code walking the device > > tree gets around to resuming that host. It's a lot more natural to > > hold off such stuff one time there than in N host drivers; especially > > since the MMC core already has such hold-off code. > > > > That actually sorts itself out as the MMC core reprobes on wakeup, but > I see your point. Right now things will work peachy if the controllers > just make sure to disable their card detection logic before telling the > core to suspend. That is, the MMC core doesn't understand wakeup events. Or, as pointed out elsewhere, well-behaved MMC hosts ... which don't need either such reprobing or the associated remove-on-suspend. - Dave _______________________________________________ linux-pm mailing list linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm