Re: [PATCH] cpuidle: avoid singing capacitors

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> But, with this patch:
> - we are penalizing good hardware and making them less power efficient
> to match the bad ones.

The question is how much it would be penalized. Most likely the penalty 
is very little. I would agree with Pierre's reasoning for enabling 
it by default: distributions will enable it anyways and it's better
to have the same defaults in the mainline kernel as with distros.

It might be worth researching a good default value though. Perhaps
it can be a lot shorter than the current one, lessing the penalty
even more?

-Andi
_______________________________________________
linux-pm mailing list
linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm

[Index of Archives]     [Linux ACPI]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [CPU Freq]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux