Re: [RFC] Add extra PM_EVENT_* codes for use by subsystems

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sunday, 2 of March 2008, Alan Stern wrote:
> On Sun, 2 Mar 2008, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> 
> > On Friday, 29 of February 2008, Alan Stern wrote:
> > > Is there any objection to adding extra PM_EVENT_* codes?  Although they
> > > won't ever be issued by the PM core, they will come in handy for
> > > internal uses in power-aware subsystems (like USB).
> > 
> > Well, this is in a (slight) conflict with the hibernation/suspend callbacks
> > rework that I'm working on with Alex.  I'll send the first patch in a few
> > minutes for comments.
> 
> If you want to add my new codes to yours, that would be fine.  Or I 
> could wait until after your new callbacks are merged before submitting 
> the new event codes.  Whatever you think is best.

That should be two different patches, I think.

If you could wait for the new callbacks, that would be better from my
standpoint (we may decide to add some more callbacks and therefore
some more PM_EVENT_* codes, for example).

Thanks,
Rafael
_______________________________________________
linux-pm mailing list
linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm

[Index of Archives]     [Linux ACPI]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [CPU Freq]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux