Hi!
> Is there any objection to adding extra PM_EVENT_* codes? Although they
> won't ever be issued by the PM core, they will come in handy for
> internal uses in power-aware subsystems (like USB).
I guess we cando that.
> Alan Stern
>
>
> Index: usb-2.6/include/linux/pm.h
> ===================================================================
> --- usb-2.6.orig/include/linux/pm.h
> +++ usb-2.6/include/linux/pm.h
> @@ -164,21 +164,40 @@ typedef struct pm_message {
> * well as during system sleep states like PM_SUSPEND_STANDBY. They may
> * be able to use wakeup events to exit from runtime low-power states,
> * or from system low-power states such as standby or suspend-to-RAM.
> + *
> + * The PM core will never issue the PMSG_ codes for USER_SUSPEND,
> + * USER_RESUME, REMOTE_WAKEUP, AUTOSUSPEND, or AUTORESUME. They are
> + * provided for internal use by power-aware subsystems.
> */
>
> -#define PM_EVENT_ON 0
> -#define PM_EVENT_FREEZE 1
> -#define PM_EVENT_SUSPEND 2
> -#define PM_EVENT_HIBERNATE 4
> -#define PM_EVENT_PRETHAW 8
> +#define PM_EVENT_ON 0x0000
> +#define PM_EVENT_FREEZE 0x0001
> +#define PM_EVENT_SUSPEND 0x0002
> +#define PM_EVENT_HIBERNATE 0x0004
> +#define PM_EVENT_PRETHAW 0x0008
I'd move that "not used by core" note here.
> +#define PM_EVENT_USER_SUSPEND 0x0010
> +#define PM_EVENT_USER_RESUME 0x0020
> +#define PM_EVENT_REMOTE_WAKEUP 0x0040
> +#define PM_EVENT_AUTOSUSPEND 0x0080
> +#define PM_EVENT_AUTORESUME 0x0100
>
> #define PM_EVENT_SLEEP (PM_EVENT_SUSPEND | PM_EVENT_HIBERNATE)
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
_______________________________________________
linux-pm mailing list
linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
