On Mon, Feb 18, 2008 at 10:19:11PM -0500, Alan Stern wrote: > On Mon, 18 Feb 2008, Pavel Machek wrote: > > > > Should we ignore this issue and submit the patches anyway? > > > > I think you should. "Easy" (and clean) solution to that issue is to > > just return -EPERM from SG_IOCTL if autosuspend is configured in ;-). > > :-) > > Okay, I'll update the patches to 2.6.25-rc2 and submit them in a few > days. (Actually the SCSI patch has to go in first and the usb-storage > patch afterward, which will probably cause it to be delayed one kernel > version. I don't know any good way to handle these cross-subsystem > updates...) Push the usb-storage one through the scsi tree as well. The subsystem maintainers handle this kind of thing all the time (for example, a sysfs feature is about to go in through the ocfs tree for this very reason.) thanks, greg k-h _______________________________________________ linux-pm mailing list linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
