Re: [rft] s2ram wakeup moves to .c, could fix few machines

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri 2008-02-08 16:32:08, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>>
>> Consolidated patch is appended.  I'll test it tomorrow on x86-64.
>>
>> I'd like to add the cleaned up beeping code to it and perhaps try to push it
>> for -mm testing without any further changes.  We can still do more cleanups in
>> followup patches.
>>
>
> The other thing to figure out is to what extent we can clean up the 
> conditionals in the video mode code by refactoring.  All they really do 
> here is save space by removing functionality not needed for wakeup, because 
> I didn't know how much space was realistic.
>
> It's possible we can remove them altogether by having a dummy boot_params 
> structure (4K).

I'd say that few #ifdefs are acceptable if we save 4K, but...

Sam... is there something that urgently needs fixing?
									Pavel
-- 
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
_______________________________________________
linux-pm mailing list
linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm

[Index of Archives]     [Linux ACPI]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [CPU Freq]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux