On Sun, Feb 03, 2008 at 11:24:07PM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote: > On Sun 2008-02-03 19:49:31, Sam Ravnborg wrote: > > On Sun, Feb 03, 2008 at 07:16:48PM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote: > > > Hi! > > > > > > > > This version works on 32-bit, and builds on 64-bit (but I'm pretty > > > > > sure it does not work. 32-bit code probably needs to go into rm/....) > > > > > > > > > > > > > Do you have an updated version or is this the latest one? > > > > > > I'm glad you ask ;-). Here's reasonably-recent version (I have > > > slightly cleaner one, but it got obscured by 2.6.24-git merge), I > > > eventually got it to work on 64-bit, by reusing trampoline.S code. > > > > > > Pavel > > > Signed-off-by: Pavel Machek <pavel@xxxxxxx> > > > > Hi PAvel. > > > > Before you submit this for real we need me to take a deper > > look into your Makefiles. > > Ok, lets get this right. > > > We do not want this duplication between boot and acpi. > > And the way you deal with code sharing from boot/ is not > > OK either. > > Well, current version has one copy in .c, then two duplicate .S > version, based on older code.... so few duplicate Makefiles do not > seem like huge deal. It is more the single files that just include another .c file. Can you drop me an updated patch sometime Monday - I already lost the inital mail and I guess you continue your updates. Sam _______________________________________________ linux-pm mailing list linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
