Re: [PATCH 0/3] More updates for 2.6.25

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wednesday, 23 of January 2008, Pavel Machek wrote:
> On Wed 2008-01-16 13:37:18, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Wednesday, 16 of January 2008, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > > On Tue 2008-01-15 23:22:33, Len Brown wrote:
> > > > On Thursday 10 January 2008 19:18, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > > > Len,
> > > > > 
> > > > > Please add the following three patches to the suspend branch.
> > > > 
> > > > Applied (and suspend branch has been re-based to latest linus tree)
> > > 
> > > Was that "lets reorder notifications, old order was more logical, but
> > > it fixes apm?" series?
> > 
> > Yes, plus the docs update from Dave Brownell.
> 
> Can we stop that reordering? I do not think it is such a good idea.

In this particular case it's needed to unbreak the APM emulation and it
certainly is not a good idea to have two different orderings of the notifiers
vs the freezer (hence the second patch in the series).

Thanks,
Rafael
_______________________________________________
linux-pm mailing list
linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm

[Index of Archives]     [Linux ACPI]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [CPU Freq]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux