Re: Rename suspend/hibernation stuff for clarity

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Monday, 7 of January 2008, Pavel Machek wrote:
> kernel/suspend_64.c and power/cpu.c were equivalent. Move them into
> power/cpu_*.c for consistency.
> 
> power/swsusp.S and kernel/suspend_asm_64.S were both misnamed and
> equivalent. Merge then minto power/hibernation_*.S.

Well, all of that are changes in the right direction, but I'm not sure if it's
the right time to do that just now.  For example, suspend_64.c in your patch
is missing the comments on __save/restore_processor_state() already queued
up for 2.6.25 by Ingo.

Any chance to base the patch on top of the mm branch of
/pub/scm / linux/kernel/git/x86/linux-2.6-x86.git ?

Thanks,
Rafael
_______________________________________________
linux-pm mailing list
linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm

[Index of Archives]     [Linux ACPI]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [CPU Freq]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux