On Sat, 5 Jan 2008, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > Another thing to watch out for: Just in case somebody ends up calling > > destroy_suspended_device(dev) from within dev's own resume method, you > > should interchange the resume_device() and the list_move_tail() > > calls in dpm_resume(). > > However, if we unregister them all at once after releasing pm_sleep_rwsem, > that shouldn't be necessary, right? It's still necessary, because destroy_suspended_device() still has to move the device from one list to another. You don't want it to end up on the dpm_locked list. Alan Stern _______________________________________________ linux-pm mailing list linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
