Re: [PATCH 1/4] PM: Introduce destroy_suspended_device()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Saturday, 5 of January 2008, Alan Stern wrote:
> On Fri, 4 Jan 2008, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> 
> > I have rebased gregkh-driver-pm-acquire-device-locks-prior-to-suspending.patch
> > on top of the $subject series, the result is appended.  It has only been
> > compilation tested for now, but I'll be testing it for the next couple of days.
> > 
> > Please review.
> 
> I would prefer it if you could also merge in this patch at the same 
> time:
> 
> https://lists.linux-foundation.org/pipermail/linux-pm/2007-December/015921.html

Makes sense, I will.

> > +void device_resume(void)
> >  {
> > -	sysdev_resume();
> > -	dpm_power_up();
> > +	might_sleep();
> > +	dpm_resume();
> > +	unlock_all_devices();
> > +	unregister_dropped_devices();
> > +	up_write(&pm_sleep_rwsem);
> >  }
> 
> With the aforementioned patch merged in, this will generate a 
> warning for each dropped device.  The call to 
> unregister_dropped_devices() should come after the up_write().
> 
> You might also consider adding a call to unregister_dropped_devices()  
> in the error path of device_suspend() -- in theory even an aborted 
> suspend might cause a device to malfunction.

In fact it already works like this, since device_suspend() now calls the entire
device_resume() on error.

> Otherwise this looks okay.

However, I think we don't need to wait with unregistering suspended devices
until after the other ones are resumed.  We only need a special function for
unregistering suspended devices that will make the PM core release the device's
semaphore before unregistering it.

I have already sent a replacemet for
gregkh-driver-pm-acquire-device-locks-prior-to-suspending.patch that includes
some code from the $subject patch and implements the above idea:

http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/1/4/278

I'm going to merge it with your patch at:
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/pipermail/linux-pm/2007-December/015921.html
and with patches [2/4] and [4/4] from the $subject series.  I'll post the
result for a review later today.

Thanks,
Rafael
_______________________________________________
linux-pm mailing list
linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm

[Index of Archives]     [Linux ACPI]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [CPU Freq]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux