On Sunday, 30 of December 2007, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > * Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > But i'm wondering - are we really ever resuming to a different > > > kernel version, for this to be an issue? > > > > The boot kernel may be different from the kernel within the image, if > > that's what you're asking for. > > how different can it be, for resume to work? I mean, we'll have deeply > kernel version dependent variables in RAM. Am i missing something > obvious? On x86-64 it can be almost totally different (by restoring a hibernation image we replace the entire contents of RAM with almost no constraints). [Well, using a relocatable kernel for restoring an image with nonrelocatable one or vice versa is rather not the best idea, but everything else should work in theory.] On i386 the boot kernel is still required to be the same as the one in the image. Greetings, Rafael _______________________________________________ linux-pm mailing list linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
