On Wed, 2007-12-19 at 10:06 -0500, Miles Lane wrote:
> [ 11.827653] PM: Creating hibernation image:
> [ 11.827658] WARNING: at arch/x86/kernel/smp_32.c:561
> native_smp_call_function_mask()
> [ 11.827661] Pid: 9940, comm: pm-hibernate Not tainted
> 2.6.24-rc5-mm1 #8
> [ 11.827665] [<c0107d55>] show_trace_log_lvl+0x12/0x25
> [ 11.827673] [<c010848a>] show_trace+0xd/0x10
> [ 11.827677] [<c0108763>] dump_stack+0x57/0x5f
> [ 11.827681] [<c0117db4>] native_smp_call_function_mask+0x41/0x126
> [ 11.827686] [<c01192d9>] smp_call_function+0x18/0x1f
> [ 11.827690] [<c012c624>] on_each_cpu+0x12/0x40
> [ 11.827695] [<c0166ece>] drain_all_pages+0x13/0x16
> [ 11.827700] [<c014f7b3>] swsusp_save+0x18/0x46b
> [ 11.827705] [<c03103fa>] swsusp_arch_suspend+0x2a/0x2c
> [ 11.827710] [<c014e7d8>] hibernate+0xba/0x16e
> [ 11.827714] [<c014d56b>] state_store+0x45/0xac
> [ 11.827717] [<c01ffe95>] kobj_attr_store+0x1a/0x22
> [ 11.827722] [<c01b92c7>] sysfs_write_file+0xb8/0xe3
> [ 11.827726] [<c01837eb>] vfs_write+0xa4/0x120
> [ 11.827731] [<c0183d5e>] sys_write+0x3b/0x60
> [ 11.827734] [<c0106bae>] sysenter_past_esp+0x6b/0xc1
> [ 11.827738] =======================
...
> [ 15.624993] =================================
> [ 15.624995] [ INFO: inconsistent lock state ]
> [ 15.624998] 2.6.24-rc5-mm1 #8
> [ 15.624999] ---------------------------------
> [ 15.625001] inconsistent {in-hardirq-W} -> {hardirq-on-W} usage.
It looks like the swsusp_save() calls drain_all_pages() , which calls
on_each_cpu() .. On return on_each_cpu() unconditionally enables
interrupts so the rest of the resume process has interrupt enable
(which , it looks like, shouldn't happen) and then you get the lockdep()
warning due to the above..
Not sure if this has been found already, or not?
Should drain_all_pages() really be drain_local_pages() ?
Daniel
_______________________________________________
linux-pm mailing list
linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
