Re: broken suspend (sched related) [Was: 2.6.24-rc4-mm1]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



* Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On 12/08/2007 09:39 AM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > * Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > 
> >> Unfortunately no change here.
> > 
> > could you try to revert this change:
> > 
> > -int softlockup_thresh = 10;
> > +int softlockup_thresh = 60;
> > 
> > i.e. change the value of softlockup_thresh back to 10. You should be 
> > able to tweak this runtime as well, without patching the kernel:
> > 
> >   echo 10 > /proc/sys/kernel/softlockup_thresh
> 
> What should have this changed? I can't see any difference.

it changes the wakeup frequency of the softlockup thread.

i'm wondering why it had no effect now - the new code is in essence a 
NOP over what we had. Could you send me your current (modified) 
kernel/softlockup.c code?

	Ingo
_______________________________________________
linux-pm mailing list
linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm

[Index of Archives]     [Linux ACPI]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [CPU Freq]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux