On Sat 2007-12-08 09:00:44, Oliver Neukum wrote: > Am Freitag, 7. Dezember 2007 19:01:12 schrieb David Brownell: > > FWIW the appended patch removes that rude "order of registration" > > policy, so that the suspend/resume list matches the device tree. > > It's behaved OK on PCs and, in light duty, a few development boards; > > I've carried it around most of this year. > > As it is a tree, why not store it as such? IIRC because we do not want recursive tree walkers in the kernel -- stack limits. -- (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html _______________________________________________ linux-pm mailing list linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
