On Sat, 2007-12-08 at 01:27 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Tuesday, 4 of December 2007, Johannes Berg wrote: > > This patch makes the freezer optional for suspend to allow the > > system to work (or not work) like the original PMU suspend. > > Generally looks good to me, but I'd probably define suspend_freeze_processes() > and suspend_thaw_processes() to be identical to freeze_processes() and > thaw_processes(), respectively, if CONFIG_SUSPEND_FREEZER is set, or to be no > ops otherwise (power.h seems to be the right place). Didn't think it was worth it, but I can do that. Will repost when I get around to it. > The other two patches are fine, I'll push them to Len in a while. Thanks! johannes
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ linux-pm mailing list linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
