On Fri, 30 November 2007 19:46:25 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote: > * Jörn Engel <joern@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > It compiles. It boots with a 512M RAM (384M was too little with all > > the other debug options on). But it seems to lock up when running > > trace-cmd. On a rerun it locks up again, but with different output. > > hm, you should decrease MAX_TRACE in kernel/latency_tracing.c from 1 > million to 16K or so. 1 million entries probably depletes lowmem quite > seriously. That's ok. RAM is cheap. > > Rerun was captured: > > http://logfs.org/~joern/trace1.jpg > > hm, that looks weird. if you disable CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING, does that > improve things? (or just turns a noisy lockup into a silent lockup?) Not much, although the dumps look different now: http://logfs.org/~joern/trace3.jpg http://logfs.org/~joern/trace4.jpg I have to change my qemu setup a little to see the top of those dumps... > > I should do a couple of runs, but my girlfriend claims realtime > > priority for the evening. > > yeah, SCHED_IDLE is not generally well received by them. ...as soon as more urgent tasks has finished (weekend is over). Jörn -- It does not matter how slowly you go, so long as you do not stop. -- Confucius _______________________________________________ linux-pm mailing list linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
