On Tuesday, 27 of November 2007, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> > From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@xxxxxxx>
> >
> > Make suspend messages start with one common prefix "PM: ".
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@xxxxxxx>
>
> I do not think I like the PREFIX idea (see other message).
The problem is that we use three different types of messages:
- with no prefix at all
- with "PM: "
- with "swsusp: "
and I think that we should use just one, preferably "PM: ".
> > @@ -344,11 +344,12 @@ static int enter_state(suspend_state_t s
> > if (!mutex_trylock(&pm_mutex))
> > return -EBUSY;
> >
> > - printk("Syncing filesystems ... ");
> > + printk(KERN_INFO PREFIX "Syncing filesystems ... ");
> > sys_sync();
> > - printk("done.\n");
> > + printk(KERN_INFO "done.\n");
>
>
> Plus this is wrong.
Yes, I've had a temporary blackout regarding prinkt(), not even making much
sense ...
I'll resend the entire series in a while.
Greetings,
Rafael
_______________________________________________
linux-pm mailing list
linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
