Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Thursday, 22 of November 2007, Franck Bui-Huu wrote: >> Anyway I just verified that the current code is broken. I put 2 >> processes waiting for a suspend evetn by reading the /dev/apm_bios >> device and a third process that does the suspend event by doing an >> ioctl() on the apm device. The system doesn't suspend (the kernel >> dumped a list of the current tasks, instead of printing "Freezing of >> tasks failed after..." BTW) and eventually the third process exits >> with an incorrect value: -EINTR. >> >> Applying your patch makes the previous test case work. > > IOW, the patch helps? yes. Franck _______________________________________________ linux-pm mailing list linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
