Re: Re: [PATCH] PM: make freezer optional for suspend

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, 2007-11-18 at 18:21 +0000, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
> 
> > > > It can't really. Things break. Ben and Paul just don't want to hear
> > > > about it. I made it depend on BROKEN so people can take it out and see
> > > > what breaks (to possibly fix it), and depend on ADB_PMU so they can have
> > > > their favourite setting without enabling BROKEN.
> > > 
> > > I understand that, but it's a bit confusing to put ADB_PMU, which is specific
> > > to powerpc, into the generic configuration file.
> > 
> > Alright, I'll give it some thought and repost later. Maybe
> > ARCH_DOESNT_WANT_FREEZER ;)
> 
> What about just 
> 
> a) reverse the logic, so that it is C_SUSPEND_NO_FREEZER
> 
> b) hardcode it in ppc-specific config?

I also wanted people interested in debugging things w/o the freezer to
use it.

johannes

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

_______________________________________________
linux-pm mailing list
linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm

[Index of Archives]     [Linux ACPI]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [CPU Freq]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux