Hi Mark,
On Thu, Oct 04, 2007 at 02:51:39PM -0700, Mark Gross wrote:
> Currently we have {cpu_dma_latency, network_latency, network_throughput}
> as the initial set of pm_qos parameters.
What about cpu_throughput{_min,_max}, as being something considered to be
proportional to the CPU frequency? This way, the cpufreq policy notifiers
might be able to utilize the pm_qos infrastructure; but maybe even also the
userspace interface (at least the min freq/max freq one)... Haven't thought
this through, but maybe you (or someone else) has.
Best,
Dominik
PS: Each time I've tried to get back into business during the past
months, something got in between -- current issue is my terminally
broken notebook...
_______________________________________________
linux-pm mailing list
linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
