Re: [PATCH 0/2 -mm] kexec based hibernation -v5

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thursday, 11 October 2007 04:13, Huang, Ying wrote:
> Kexec base hibernation has some potential advantages over uswsusp and
> TuxOnIce (suspend2). Some most obvious advantages are:

Well, I have some doubts as far as the obviousness is concerned.

> 1. The hibernation image size can exceed half of memory size easily.

This is also possible with TuxOnIce.

> 2. The hibernation image can be written to and read from almost
>    anywhere, such as USB disk, NFS.

This is possible with uswsusp, at least in theory, probably with TuxOnIce too.

> 3. It is possible to eliminate freezer from kexec based hibernation
>    implementation.

This isn't true as long as we have not changed the handling of devices
(which is in the works, but will take time).

> 4. Based on kexec/kdump implementation, the kernel code needed is
>    less.

Well, maybe.

Greetings,
Rafael
_______________________________________________
linux-pm mailing list
linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm

[Index of Archives]     [Linux ACPI]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [CPU Freq]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux