On Wed, Sep 26, 2007 at 10:53:03PM -0400, Valdis.Kletnieks@xxxxxx wrote: > On Wed, 26 Sep 2007 17:40:20 PDT, Mark Gross said: > > --- linux-2.6.23-rc8/kernel/Makefile 2007-09-26 13:54:54.000000000 -0700 > > +++ linux-2.6.23-rc8-qos/kernel/Makefile 2007-09-26 14:06:38.000000000 - > 0700 > > @@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ > > rcupdate.o extable.o params.o posix-timers.o \ > > kthread.o wait.o kfifo.o sys_ni.o posix-cpu-timers.o mutex.o \ > > hrtimer.o rwsem.o latency.o nsproxy.o srcu.o die_notifier.o \ > > - utsname.o > > + utsname.o qos_params.o > > So I don't get a choice in the matter if I will be dragging this thing > around in my kernel, even if I have no intention of using the functionality? > You don't get that option with latency.c either at the moment, and it's arguable whether it's even worth it. The more curious thing is that while this qos params seems to be an evolution of Arjan's latency.c (and the drivers that are using it are updated in the rest of the patch set), latency.c itself is still compiled in. Is this an oversight, or was it intentional? One set of latency hinting APIs only, please :-) _______________________________________________ linux-pm mailing list linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
