Hi. On Friday 21 September 2007 11:06:23 Andrew Morton wrote: > On Fri, 21 Sep 2007 10:24:34 +1000 Nigel Cunningham <nigel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > Hi Andrew. > > > > On Thursday 20 September 2007 20:09:41 Pavel Machek wrote: > > > Seems like good enough for -mm to me. > > > > > > Pavel > > > > Andrew, if I recall correctly, you said a while ago that you didn't want > > another hibernation implementation in the vanilla kernel. If you're going to > > consider merging this kexec code, will you also please consider merging > > TuxOnIce? > > > > The theory is that kexec-based hibernation will mainly use preexisting > kexec code and will permit us to delete the existing hibernation > implementation. > > That's different from replacing it. TuxOnIce doesn't remove the existing implementation either. It can transparently replace it, but you can enable/disable that at compile time. Regards, Nigel -- Nigel Cunningham Christian Reformed Church of Cobden 103 Curdie Street, Cobden 3266, Victoria, Australia Ph. +61 3 5595 1185 / +61 417 100 574 Communal Worship: 11 am Sunday. _______________________________________________ linux-pm mailing list linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
