Hi. On Friday 21 September 2007 22:18:19 Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Friday, 21 September 2007 13:58, Nigel Cunningham wrote: > > Hi. > > > > On Friday 21 September 2007 21:56:29 Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > [Besides, the current hibernation userland interface is used by default by > > > openSUSE and it's also used by quite some Debian users, so we can't drop > > > it overnight and it can't be implemented in a compatible way on top of the > > > kexec-based solution.] > > > > Could it be fudged by giving userland a null image and having (say) the first > > ioctl be one that triggers all the real work (with other ioctls being noops > > or such like, as appropriate)? > > Well, the "suspend" part is probably doable, but I'm afraid of the "resume" > one. 'k. I've occasionally thought about trying it, but haven't ever gotten around to actually doing it yet. (I'd like to make TuxOnIce transparently replace both swsusp and uswsusp if I could). Regards, Nigel _______________________________________________ linux-pm mailing list linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm