Hi! > > Does this make sense? > > Yes, this is a sensible optimization. But I think it may be better to > make bootloader load kernel D directly into a specified memory location. > For example, we can add a option to "kernel" command of grub. > > And, I think we can do more in bootloader. Such as we can prepare > two Yes, that would be nice. It will mean quite a bit of work, but I guess it should be the long term goal. Loading restore kernel directly from bootloader means: 1) it is fast -- no need to boot another kernel 2) it is "classical" way of doing things On the other hand, we loose flexibility that way: 1) it locks you onto one bootloader 2) you no longer have userland there to do uncompression, decryption, etc.. Pave -- (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html _______________________________________________ linux-pm mailing list linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
