On Sun, 26 Aug 2007, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
> Hi
>
> trying to understand when suspend_late gets called, I just wasn't quite
> sure if I got the following points right:
>
> 1. seems to be a typo in the comment above
> drivers/base/power/suspend.c::device_power_down() - the function walks the
> dpm_off list and not the dpm_off_irq list, as claimed in the comment
Yes, it's a typo.
> 2. in device_suspend() in the same file - this test:
>
> if (!list_empty(&dev->power.entry)) {
>
> is it to catch concurrent device removal, say, from device_pm_remove()?
Yes.
> Which would mean in normal case every device would be passed to bus_type's
> suspend_late() if it's implemented?
Yes.
Alan Stern
_______________________________________________
linux-pm mailing list
linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
