Hi! > > > No, I do not think I like that. I believe both -> control and -> crc > > > is just useless paranoia. Bitflip in this area is not going to be any > > > worse than bitflip anywhere else, we should not pretend this is > > > somehow "more important". > > > > > > -> control should really be "protocol version"... probably should > > > contain some field that is easy to increment. > > > > OK > > > > Perhaps I'll just remove the crc field. > > Like in the patch below. Yep, thanks. > --- > From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@xxxxxxx> > > Since we already pass the address of restore_registers() in the image header, > we can also pass the value of the CR3 register from before the hibernation in > the same way. This will allow us to avoid using init_level4_pgt page tables > during the restore. ACK. > @@ -9,6 +9,7 @@ > > #include <linux/smp.h> > #include <linux/suspend.h> > +#include <linux/crc32.h> > #include <asm/proto.h> > #include <asm/page.h> > #include <asm/pgtable.h> This one is no longer neccessary. Pavel -- (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html _______________________________________________ linux-pm mailing list linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
