Re: Re: [PATH 1/1] Kexec jump - v2 - kexec jump

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi!

> On Thu, 2007-08-16 at 12:26 +0200, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > Ping... is there some next version?
> > 
> > I'm stuck at the tools side currently. kexec-1.101 just won't load the
> > kernel properly, and kexec-testing from git does not know -j option. I
> > tried hand-patching it, but got lots of scary rejects.
> > 
> > Is there chance for a patch against kexec-testing?
> 
> I have some other work to do recently. So the next version will delay
> for some while. :(

Ok, I got it to work -- thanks a lot.

Yes, acpi=off is mandatory. Unfortunately, thinkpad x60 does not boot
with acpi=off (should we add another test to linux firmware kit?
Machines should still boot in acpi=off mode...). acpi=off noapic
nolapic nosmp makes it boot, and that in turn makes kjump work.

Screen is not refreshed on kjump back to original kernel, but I guess
that's to be expected. I did not play with framebuffer, yet.

Maybe it is time to move kjump functionality into -mm and
kexec-testing?

									Pavel
-- 
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
_______________________________________________
linux-pm mailing list
linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm

[Index of Archives]     [Linux ACPI]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [CPU Freq]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux