Hi! > > > Nice. These variables always annoyed me too when looking > > > at that code. > > > > > > > DEFINE(pbe_next, offsetof(struct pbe, next)); > > > > BLANK(); > > > > + DEFINE(saved_context_rbx, offsetof(struct saved_context, rbx)); > > > > > > But is there a reason you can't just use a pt_regs and then an array > > > for the crNs ? > > > > Hm, I think I can use pt_regs. I'll try to redo the patch to use it. > > The updated patch (using pt_regs) is appended. Looks ok to me. Pavel -- (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html _______________________________________________ linux-pm mailing list linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
