On Monday, 13 August 2007 20:35, Sam Ravnborg wrote: > On Mon, Aug 13, 2007 at 03:21:54PM +0200, Michal Piotrowski wrote: > > > > > > > > The patch changes the warning to a different warning, it's now > > > > kernel/power/Kconfig:79:warning: 'select' used by config symbol 'PM_SLEEP_SMP' refers to undefined symbol 'HOTPLUG_CPU' > > So we have something like this for ppc: > > config PM_SLEEP_SMP > bool "bla bla" Plus a couple of "depends on ..." here, which cannot be true. > select HOTPLUG_CPU > > As it is not in my -linus tree it has been added by the referanced patch > in the text I zapped. > > > The warning is generated _independently_ of the actual configuration. > All it says is that the symbol PM_SLEEP_SMP has a seelct statement > for an unknown symbol - unknown for this architecture at least. > > Grepping will reveal that HOTPLUG_CPU is not present for ppc and > the easiet fix here seems to just add it like in the following: > > diff --git a/arch/ppc/Kconfig b/arch/ppc/Kconfig > index 6bdeeb7..e7bcd57 100644 > --- a/arch/ppc/Kconfig > +++ b/arch/ppc/Kconfig > @@ -65,6 +65,10 @@ config GENERIC_BUG > default y > depends on BUG > > +config HOTPLUG_CPU > + bool > + default n > + > source "init/Kconfig" > > menu "Processor" > > [cut'n'paste so whitespace damaged...] > This will silence the warning... > > > Now as PM_SLEEP_SMP requires HOTPLUG_CPU there most be done > something else to prevent this config symbol to be selected > otherwise we would end up with a kernel that has HOTPLUG_CPU > defined even it is not supported. Well, the issue at hand is that PM_SLEEP_SMP will never be set on this arch and the warning is printed nevertheless. Greetings, Rafael -- "Premature optimization is the root of all evil." - Donald Knuth _______________________________________________ linux-pm mailing list linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
