On Wednesday, 8 August 2007 01:03, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Sun, 5 Aug 2007 21:14:01 +0200 > "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > > +#ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP > > + > > +/* > > + * Suspend the interface. > > + */ > > + > > +static int uli526x_suspend(struct pci_dev *pdev, pm_message_t state) > > Since when did suspend and resume methods become dependent upon CONFIG_PM_SLEEP? > > We have eight thousand implementations of this, all of which presently > use CONFIG_PM. Yes, they do, but if CONFIG_PM_SLEEP is not set, they won't be used. Greetings, Rafael _______________________________________________ linux-pm mailing list linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
