Re: [patch 2.6.23-rc2 1/2] define clk_must_disable()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Monday 06 August 2007, David Brownell wrote:
> > Please don't wrap up unreviewed patches as "important build fixes".
> 
> From my perspective, they've been reviewed for well over a year and
> have just been waiting for me to get off my butt and be extremely
> explicit that they need to merge.  (That is, not expect anyone to
> just pick them up and merge.)

Oh, and one more point in favor of merging this:  they've been in
use in Andrew Victor's 2.6 AT91 patches since last November.

That would be yet another reason why nobody has noticed this build
problem before.  It's not just me; almost everyone doing AT91 work
is *already using* these two patches, and has been doing so for most
of the last year.


> And since you asked for a build fix ... I have a hard time thinking
> that anything else could really be the "right fix".
 


_______________________________________________
linux-pm mailing list
linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm

[Index of Archives]     [Linux ACPI]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [CPU Freq]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux