On Mon, 6 Aug 2007, Cornelia Huck wrote: > On Fri, 3 Aug 2007 23:39:31 +0200, > "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > Suggested functions: > > > > > > 1. Move A in front of B, together with all of A's ancestors which > > > aren't already ahead of B (or maybe require that A's parent be > > > ahead of B already). > > I'd prefer "move includes ancestors" as not to introduce another > possibility where users can get it wrong. We'll see how it ends up being used. If we check that A's parent is already ahead of B then callers won't be able to get it wrong. Alan Stern _______________________________________________ linux-pm mailing list linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
