Re: [RFC][PATCH -mm 3/3] Freezer: Replace the timeout

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi!

> > > Anyway, eventually, I'd like the freezer to detect failures relatively early,
> > > so the user won't have to wait 20s each time it's going to fail.
> > 
> > It should not fail ;-). And failures are _really_ rare these days. Is
> > 20second wait in case of kernel bug that bad? (FUSE case _is_ a kernel
> > bug, I'm just not sure how to solve it. It is still rare.)
> 
> Well, not very bad, but still.  Perhaps we should use a progress meter of
> some kind to let the user know that something's going on. ;-)

Maybe we should move the process freezing to userspace :-))).

Wait... that would do the trick. We would blame userspace for FUSE
problems, then ;-).
									Pavel
-- 
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
_______________________________________________
linux-pm mailing list
linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm

[Index of Archives]     [Linux ACPI]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [CPU Freq]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux