Re: [PATCH][Fix] Hibernation: Do not try to mark invalid PFNs as nosave

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi!

> [Please consider as 2.6.23 material.]
> ---
> From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@xxxxxxx>
> 
> On some systems some PFNs reported by the early initialization code as 'nosave'
> may be invalid.  If we try to set the corresponding bits in the hibernation
> bitmap, BUG_ON() in memory_bm_find_bit() will be triggered and the system
> won't be able to boot  (cf. https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=296242).
> 
> Prevent this from happening by verifying if the 'nosave' PFNs are valid in
> mark_nosave_pages().
> 
> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@xxxxxxx>

ACK.

> @@ -709,7 +709,8 @@ static void mark_nosave_pages(struct mem
>  				region->end_pfn << PAGE_SHIFT);
>  
>  		for (pfn = region->start_pfn; pfn < region->end_pfn; pfn++)
> -			memory_bm_set_bit(bm, pfn);
> +			if (pfn_valid(pfn))
> +				memory_bm_set_bit(bm, pfn);
>  	}
>  }
>  

-- 
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
_______________________________________________
linux-pm mailing list
linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm

[Index of Archives]     [Linux ACPI]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [CPU Freq]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux