On Tue, 31 Jul 2007 11:11:50 -0400 (EDT), Alan Stern <stern@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I wonder if device_move() shouldn't change the order of entries in the > dpm_active list so that the new parent (and all its ancestors) get > moved up ahead of the device's position? But that might cause other > problems... This may be necessary if walking the list is the single determining factor to the order of suspend/resume. Are there any other dependencies not covered by time of registration order? I would imagine those needed moving devices on the dpm_active list as well... _______________________________________________ linux-pm mailing list linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
