Re: Towards eliminating the freezer

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thursday, 26 July 2007 21:32, Alan Stern wrote:
> On Wed, 25 Jul 2007, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> 
> > > > So, who's writing the patch? ;-)
> > > 
> > > I can do it.  You haven't made any changes to this part of the code, 
> > > have you?
> > 
> > Yes, I have, quite recently. :-)
> > 
> > > My work tends to be based on Linus's tree, not -mm. 
> > 
> > At the moment they are pretty much in line, at least as far as this code is
> > concerned.  Anyway, I'm trying to keep track of PM-related patches,
> > at http://www.sisk.pl/kernel/hibernation_and_suspend/2.6.23-rc1/
> 
> I got your snapshot file.  None of the patches in it modify anything
> in drivers/base/power/*, so there shouldn't be any interference.

I think that's correct.

> By the way, just checking: Apparently when device_power_down() in 
> suspend.c calls sysdev_suspend(), if there's an error it doesn't then 
> call dpm_power_up().  Is it correct to assume this is a bug?

Yes.

Greetings,
Rafael


-- 
"Premature optimization is the root of all evil." - Donald Knuth
_______________________________________________
linux-pm mailing list
linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm

[Index of Archives]     [Linux ACPI]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [CPU Freq]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux