It seems that you could still potentially get a failure to freeze if one FUSE process depends on another, and the one that is frozen second just happens to be waiting on the one that is frozen first when it is frozen. I admit that this situation is unlikely, and perhaps acceptable. A larger concern is that it seems that freezing FUSE processes at all _will_ generate deadlocks if a non-synchronous or memory-map-supporting filesystem is loopback mounted from a FUSE filesystem. In that case, if you attempt to sync or free memory once FUSE is frozen, you are sure to get a deadlock. -- Jeremy Maitin-Shepard _______________________________________________ linux-pm mailing list linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
