On Wed, 18 Jul 2007, Matthew Garrett wrote:
On Tue, Jul 17, 2007 at 08:54:24PM -0700, david@xxxxxxx wrote:
On Wed, 18 Jul 2007, Matthew Garrett wrote:
On Tue, Jul 17, 2007 at 08:19:32AM -0700, david@xxxxxxx wrote:
On Tue, 17 Jul 2007, Matthew Garrett wrote:
Powering off rather than using S4 means you lose most wakeup device
support. That would be a functional regression compared to the current
code.
only if the kexec isn't able to initialize those devices.
If you aren't using ACPI, you probably don't know how to.
the current kexec patch to allow you to move back to the original kernel
requires ACPI be disabled to work.
Which means it isn't putting the hardware into S4, which means that you
don't get the platform wakeup events.
Ok, I was misunderstanding what you meant by wakeup device support. if you
are meaning things like wake-on-lan then yes, you do loose that with no
ACPI support, but that is acceptable to many people. I understand it's not
for some, and I'm not saying that this should be the only type of suspend,
but I'm also saying that this should be one option.
David Lang
_______________________________________________
linux-pm mailing list
linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
