Hi, No one interested in this topic? I thought it might be hot. :) On Fri, 2007-07-06 at 05:30 +0800, David Brownell wrote: > On Thursday 05 July 2007, Alan Stern wrote: > > > Dave, you created the original wakeup attribute. What do you think > > about adding a separate wakeup_runtime? (At a minimum, perhaps you > can > > suggest a better name!) I think it's reasonable. > I'll have to scan the emails in my queue to see what the issue > is (umm, is this really 300+ messages in just the last couple > days??) but my initial reaction is to avoid complications. We > have enough configuration knobs ... but userspace hasn't even > begun to use them. Adding more knobs will not improve that > situation at all. Well, I can not find one for the system sleep wakeup attribute, I mean the ability to wakeup the system from a sleep state. The patch http://www.spinics.net/lists/mm-commits/msg27356.html makes the "wakeup" from device runtime suspend and the "wakeup" from system suspend both controlled by .../power/wakeup. This doesn't work in some cases, and that's why the patch http://www.spinics.net/lists/mm-commits/msg30526.html are dropped. I think we should find an alternative way instead of using .../power/wakeup. Another wakeup file or more values in the .../power/wakeup makes sense to me, while the first one seems better. :) Dave, what's you opinion? Are there any available knobs that we can make use of but I missed? Thanks, Rui > At one level, we want USB mice and keyboards to act pretty much > like the PS2 variety. Which means being wakeup sources in most > cases ... though BIOS settings often overrides the PS2 stuff. > > It'd make sense that _removing_ devices not normally be a wake > event for USB ports. But we don't always have that option... _______________________________________________ linux-pm mailing list linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
