Re: [PATCH 0/2] Kexec jump: The first step to kexec base hibernation

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



by the way, a data point on kernel sizes

-rw-r--r-- 1 root root  864648 Jul 14 00:53 vmlinuz.2.6.22.1.hibernate
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root  659496 Jul 14 01:17 vmlinuz.2.6.22.1.hibernate.stripped
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 3948168 Jul 14 01:10 vmlinuz.2.6.22.1.running

the running one matches the config I'm running on my home server, the hibernate is a pretty stripped down version, and the stripped is close to a minimum (including turning off printk and BUG()). All three are with all drivers built-in, no module support.

this is on a amd64 64 bit system

configs are available if anyone cares, the point is how much smaller a kernel could be if it doesn't need all the stuff that you put in your main kernel. In my case this includes not enabling the 3-ware card that holds my 12-disk raid array, instead the hibernate image would be stored on one of the scsi drives attached to the adaptec 78xx card.

I expect that on a normal desktop/laptop with more features (like sound) the savings could be even more significant

David Lang
_______________________________________________
linux-pm mailing list
linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm

[Index of Archives]     [Linux ACPI]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [CPU Freq]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux