On Thu, 2007-07-12 at 20:06 -0700, david@xxxxxxx wrote: > >> I agree, a stipped down hibernate kernel can be very small, not allocating > >> this memory until it's needed is a step for the final polishing. > > > > I'm not sure if I agree with that. In any case, having to use two different > > kernels for hibernation would be a big drawback. > > I see it as a big advantage to not have to use the main kernel for the > suspend. please keep it as an option at least. Yes. It has additional bonus to make it possible to write/read image from a program other than main kernel. For example, for a specific mobile device product (Such as Intel MID), a customized ultra-small program (or kernel) can be composed to write/read image. That way, the hibernate/resume time can be reduced to minimal. Best Regards, Huang Ying _______________________________________________ linux-pm mailing list linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
